Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11354 14
Original file (NR11354 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

TUIR
Docket No: 11354-14
11 March 2015

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

eee oe
XXX-XX ; , ,

Ref: (a) 10 0.S.C. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments

(2) Case summary with attachments
(3) Subject's naval record/cD

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by
removing a nonjudicial punishment (NJP} dated 15 May 2008, which

reflects an erroneously filed offense of underage drinking. This

request includes, but is not limited to, removal of all
references to the NJP and the offense from his Official Military
Personnel File (OMPF), the Marine Corps Total Force System

(MCTFS), and her Electronic Service Record (ESR). Enclosures (2)
and (3) apply.

2.. The Board, consisting of [iis

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3
March 2015, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion (AO) provided by
Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC), a copy of which is attached to

enclosure (2).

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
TIR
Docket No: 11354-14

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

.¢., Petitioner's record contains an NJP entry dated 15 May
2008, which reflects, in part, an offense of being drunk due to
consuming alcoholic beverages while under the legal drinking age.
This NJP also reflects a second offense of disobeying a lawful
order.

d. An advisory opinion from the HQMC Military Personnel Law
Branch, Judge Advocate Division (JPL) states, in part, that
because Petitioner was in fact of legal age, specifically, age
22, to consume alcoholic beverages in the state of Maryland,
‘where the legal drinking age is 21, thé verbiage should be
pexmanently removed from his record. However, the advisory
further states that the NJP.itself should remain in the record
since he was guilty of disobeying a lawful order by not reporting
underage drinking by others.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the JPL advisory opinion, the Board
concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial favorable
action. In this regard, the Board concludes that all references
in his record regarding underage drinking, should be removed or
obliterated.

In view of the foregoing, the, Board finds the existence of an
error or injustice warranting the following partial corrective
action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by totally
obliterating or removing the verbiage “drunk under the legal
drinking age” and all references thereto.

b. That any and all materials or entries inconsistent with or
' relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or materials be added to the record in the future.

c. That no further relief be granted.
TIR
Docket No: 11354-14

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c), it is certified that .a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing -is a true and complete record of the Board's .
proceedings in. the above entitled matter. fe

Te “ REED
Recorder

S. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy. . ;

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5400 13

    Original file (NR5400 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing a Unit Punishment Book (UPB) entry dated 23 January 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6447 14

    Original file (NR6447 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all references regarding imposition of a nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for willful disobedience. In this regard, these AOs recommend Petitioner's request be denied because he did receive NJP on 11 May 2007, and was properly issued an adverse FITREP as a result of the NUP. REED Recorder S....

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500884

    Original file (MD0500884.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. )“I was discharged from the Marine Corps for continued underage drinking. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8306 14

    Original file (NR8306 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TJR Docket No: 8306-14 8 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Vos secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD | Re ae USMC, XXX - XX - Ref: (a) 1/0: Ue, @, 1552 Encl (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary with attachments ~~ (3) Petitioner's naval record (excerpts) Als Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4197 14

    Original file (NR4197 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    g. Both advisory opinions, enclosure (2), received from Headquarters Marine Corps (JPL and MIQ) regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the NJPs and Page 11 entries recommend his request be denied because these documents were properly, factually, accurately, and legally written and filed. However, the AO from JPL recommends partial relief for Petitioner’s disproportionate punishment, specifically, 60 days of extra duty awarded at both NJP hearings. In this regard, the record should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1942-13

    Original file (NR1942-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material regarding the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 1 April 2010 from his official military personnel file (OMPF). e. An advisory opinion received from the Marine Corps regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the NUP and page 11 entries recommended relief. That any...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5734 14

    Original file (NR5734 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Enclosures {1) through (3) apply. rebuttal dated 6 April 2009. d. An AO, “enclosure (4), received from the HOMC Military Personnel Law Branch, regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the documents which references the NJP recommends relief. In this regard, and especially in light of the favorable AO, the Board substantially concurs with the comments contained in the AO and concludes that in the absence of the NUP document, the documentation referencing it, as it appears in the record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8499 14

    Original file (NR8499 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing derogatory material, “specifically, an offense of. from — Petitioner's record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by totally obliterating or removing the verbiage “Art 128, assault consummated by batter” and all references thereto.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2569 14

    Original file (NR2569 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing an erroneously filed administrative remarks (page 11) entry dated 13 May 2013 which references a period of unauthorized absence (UA) and racially inflammatory comments. of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by totally obliterating or removing the verbiage “during the period...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05297-02

    Original file (05297-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The GCMCA declined to act on Petitioner's specific complaint about the NJP since applicable directives state that such a disciplinary action is not a proper subject of an Article 138 complaint. OONOV02' to OlMAR15, as corrected by the (GCMCA), refers to the results of (NJP) where the charged deiekination that your Evaluation Report for the reporting period of;ense does not state an offense under the UCMJ. Paragraph 4 q. UCMJ Article 92(1)2 states that it is an offense to or beyond the...